Attentional demands while driving in a simulator: effects of driving straights on open roads, approaching intersections and doubling maneuvers
N. Teasdale, V. Cantin, G. Desroches, J. Blouin, M. Simoneau
Pages: 29-38
Abstract:
Proportionally more accidents are occurring in complex situations, such as intersections. Presumably, this higher rate of accidents is associated with a higher momentary mental workload created by the intersection. Two experiments are presented to examine if this mental workload can be manipulated while driving in a simulator. We adopted the probe reaction time technique to measure the attentional demands while driving. For each experiment, ten active drivers drove through a continuous 10-km scenario including rural and urban sections. They were asked to follow speed limits and to comply with local traffic laws throughout the course of the experiment. They were also told to consider driving as the primary task. For the first experiment, auditory stimuli were given while driving on open roads and when approaching intersections. The stimuli could be presented when the car was 100 m or 60 m from the intersection. For the second experiment, the stimuli were given while driving on open roads, when approaching intersections (75 m), and when performing lane change and doubling maneuvers. RT (ms accuracy) was defined as the temporal interval between the auditory stimulus and the onset of a verbal response (a loud top, detected from the analog signal of a piezo-electric microphone fixed on a headset). RT was also measured for a baseline control condition without driving (10 stimuli). Several variables characterizing the driving performance were collected. For both experiments. driving yielded RTs that were slower than for the baseline condition. More important, experiment 1 showed that stopping at an intersection required more cognitive demands than driving on open roads (on average, 519 ms for the open road conditions vs 727 ms for both intersection conditions); experiment 2 yielded similar results and the lane change and doubling maneuvers was the driving context that required the most important cognitive demands (on average, 612 ms for the open road conditions, 675 ms for the intersection conditions, and 816 ms for the lane change and doubling maneuvers). Results clearly show that driving, even for ideal conditions, is not an automatic task. Future experiments should attempt to examine whether various categories of drivers (eg novice, elderly) are affected differentially by various contexts and whether the increased mental workload has an effect on the driving performance. The technical approach developed could allow to develop more challenging scenarios and to validate workload observed for real driving contexts.
Keywords: simulator; attention; intersections; mental workload
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES