Forward looking blindspots: A report of A-Pillar induced field-of-view obstruction and driver performance in a simulated rural environment
C. Hammond, M.G. Wade
Pages: 69-81
Abstract:
Forward-looking blindspots occur when the driver’s field of view is compromised as a result of the obscured line of sight produced by the support pillar on either side of the windshield, also known as the A-pillar. This differs from the “traditional” concept of the rear-view blindspot. This obscured region enables an approaching vehicle to remain hidden for an extended time due to coincident acceleration or deceleration. This interaction holds serious implications for real world events as well as research results in traffic interactions and automotive design. This study analyzed the relationship between the size of the forwardlooking blindspot (FLB), the approach speeds of two vehicles approaching an intersection at right angles, and driver behavior relative to an accident likely event. The wrap around simulator (WAS) at the University of Minnesota Human Factors Research Lab (HFRL) is a large dome like structure with wrap around screens and multiple projectors that produce a forward field of view image of approximately 130 degrees about an instrumented vehicle. At each simulated intersection, the manner in which the participants scanned the virtual environment was observed and scored in four categories or levels: I. Eyes fixed- peripheral vision only II. Eyes only scan- left/right, no head motion. III. Eye/head scan – head rotates but no change in position IV. Active scan – head moves around left/right, forward/back (looking around A-pillar) Participants were also scored as to target vehicle acquisition and collision. Acquisition increased at each increased level of scanning and the collision rate decreased at the “active” scanning levels (III & IV). Signage (yield) at intersections produced no significant correlation with the acquisition rate, collision rate or scanning level). It would appear that in the interaction between automotive design, traffic systems and driver behavior, the complacency or resulting inactivity of the driver’s scanning behavior can produce a common and hazardous driving condition. This issue applies to automotive and pedestrian traffic as well and explains to some degree why pedestrians often seem to appear in the road as one initiates a left or right turn.
Keywords: blindspot; A-pillar; virtual environment; complacency; collision; scanning
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES