Early experience with HEADS: Hepatic Encephalopathy Assessment Driving Simulator
S.L. Nyberg, E.S. Baskin-Bey, M.M. Mitchell, J.P. Bida, N.K. Schneider, G.E. Smith, T.J. Rosenthal, C.A. Stewart
Pages: 53-62
Abstract:
Very little is known about the use of simulated driving to assess neurological impairment in the setting of liver disease. The specific aim this pilot study was to determine if a computerized driving routine could identify individuals judged to be impaired by neuropsychological testing from a population of cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation. Driving performance of cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation (n=15) and healthy volunteers (n=31) was compared in a preliminary evaluation of the Hepatic Encephalopathy Assessment Driving Simulator (HEADS). Cirrhotic patients also underwent standardized neuropsychological testing to assess six cognitive domains (attention, learning, memory, motor, processing speed, visual); impairment of each domain was defined by a Z-score < -1. Thirteen of fifteen cirrhotics were classified as impaired in at least one cognitive domain based on neuropsychological testing. Driving performance of impaired cirrhotics differed significantly from the cohort of non-impaired plus healthy subjects (n=33). Several driving variables showed a strong correlation with impairment of at least one cognitive domain. In contrast, driving performance could not be predicted from MELD score in this population of cirrhotic patients. A computer-simulated driving system such as HEADS may prove useful as a simple and practical means to assess cognitive impairment from liver disease. Further validation is indicated in a larger study population of cirrhotic patients.
Keywords: driver behaviour; impaired driving; cirrhosis; neuropsychological tests; scoring system
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES