Safety evaluation of right turn followed by U-turn at a signalized intersection as an alternative to direct left turn from driveways
F. Pirinccioglu, J.J. Lu, J.C. Pernia
Pages: 71-79
Abstract:
Direct left turns (DLT) from the driveways have been a concern for transportation engineers as a major source of operational and safety problems. In the past, several studies have been conducted addressing the safety and operational problems related to DLT movements, and alternatives to direct left turn from driveways. This paper evaluated the safety effects of right turns followed by U-turns at signalized intersections (RTUT) as an alternative to direct left turns from driveways and side streets. The safety evaluation was accomplished by comparison of traffic conflicts. Nine types of conflicts were selected for this study. Five of the conflicts were related to RTUT movements, while the rest of them were related to DLT movements. Data were collected with the help of video recording equipment at a total of eight sites for over 300 hours. Two types of conflict rates, conflicts per hour and conflicts per thousand involved vehicles were used for safety comparison of the two left turning alternatives. DLT movements generated averagely 6.7 conflicts per hour, while RTUT movements generated 2.4 conflicts per hour. On the other hand, average number of conflicts per thousand vehicles involved for DLT and RTUT movements were 40.6 and 26.2 respectively. Severity of conflicts was analyzed by use of Risk of Collision (ROC) scores. In general, when both DLT and RTUT are compared, based on the results of this study, RTUT movements reduce the number of conflicts, and the overall severity of RTUT related conflicts are significantly lower than that of DLT related conflicts.
Keywords: safety evaluation; signalized intersection; U-turn; conflicts; severity analysis
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES