Home

Aims and Scope

Instructions for Authors

View Issues & Articles

Editorial Board

Article Search

ATS International Journal
Editor in Chief: Prof. Alessandro Calvi
Address: Via Vito Volterra 62,
00146, Rome, Italy.
Mail to: alessandro.calvi@uniroma3.it

The relationship between sleep patterns and the experience of simulator sickness and motion sickness

O.S. Fagbemi, K. Pfeffer
Pages: 63-70

Abstract:

Driving simulators are increasingly being used in training and research. Among the complications of driving simulator use is simulator sickness. This study focuses on individual differences in experience of simulator sickness. Twenty-five healthy participants (14 women and 11 men) with a valid driving licence were tested. The mean age of participants was 41.36 years (range 21-59 years, SD = 11.59). After giving written consent to participate, participants were asked to complete a set of questionnaires regarding their age, general health, experience of motion sickness and sleeping patterns. Sleep questions were concerned with sleeping problems (e.g., daytime sleepiness, difficulty falling asleep, difficulty staying asleep and too little sleep), as well as sleeping and waking times. Simulator sickness criteria were experience of nausea and general discomfort, fatigue, headache, blurred vision, dizziness and disorientation. All participants drove a fixed-base driving simulator (STISIM PC-based interactive driving simulator model 100) for about 20 minutes. Nine participants reported severe headache, dizziness, disorientation and general eye strain to the extent that all declined to continue with subsequent experimental trials. These nine participants (simulator sickness group) were compared with the remaining sixteen participants that did not experience simulator sickness (nonsickness group). The simulator sickness group were significantly older (49.2 ± 2.2 years) than the non-sickness group (36.9 ± 2.9 years). There was no significant difference in the number of males and females in the two groups. Six of the nine in the simulator sickness group reported a history of motion sickness while only two of the nonsickness group reported having had motion sickness. The simulator sickness group reported significantly more difficulty staying asleep, fewer hours of sleep, and described themselves as lighter sleepers than the non-sickness group. These results were not correlated with age. Participants who currently experienced motion sickness also reported significantly more difficulty staying asleep, fewer hours of sleep and described themselves as lighter sleepers that those who do not experience motion sickness. In addition, this group reported a significantly earlier waking-up time on non-working days. The results of this study highlight the need to include sleep patterns among the simulator sickness screening criteria.
Keywords: simulator sickness; sleep patterns; driver behaviour

2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
2023 ISSUES
2022 ISSUES
2021 ISSUES
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
2018 ISSUES
2017 ISSUES
2016 ISSUES
2015 ISSUES
2014 ISSUES
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES