The impact of roadway intersection design on simulated driving performance of younger and older adults during recovery from a turn
O. Shechtman, S. Classen, B. Stephens, E. Davis, K. Awadzi, W. Mann
Pages: 7-20
Abstract:
Objective: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) proposed guidelines for highway design to increase the safe driving ability of older drivers. Little empirical evidence exists to support the effectiveness of these guidelines. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the improved design features are effective during recovery from a turn in 4 pairs of intersections using a high-fidelity driving simulator. Methods: Using the FHWA guidelines, we replicated four pairs of improved versus unimproved intersection in a driving simulator. We examined driving performance, as indicated by kinematic measures, of younger (25-45 years) and older (65-85 years) drivers during recovery from a turn in four intersection pairs. Thirty-nine subjects, 19 young and 20 older adults, participated in the study. Kinematic measures were obtained from the simulator and analyzed for differences. Results: Our findings indicated that the FHWA guidelines for implementing safe road conditions were helpful in one of the four improved intersections for both younger and older drivers. We also found that older drivers did not benefit more or less than younger drivers from implementing the FHWA guidelines. Finally, younger drivers exhibited higher speeds during the recovery phase of the three left-turn intersections. Conclusions: These findings suggest that both young and older drivers may benefit from some of the safety features recommended by the FHWA guidelines. The findings of the present study may provide critical information for enhancing safe driving to those involved in roadway design, such as engineers, planners, and policy makers.
Keywords: older and younger drivers; driving simulation; driving kinematics; roadway infrastructure; highway safety; intersection design
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES