Simulated lane departure warning system reduces the width of lane that drivers use
N.W. Mullen, M. Bédard, J. A. Riendeau, T. J. Rosenthal
Pages: 33-44
Abstract:
In-vehicle lane departure warning systems are designed to decrease the number of vehicle crashes that result from drivers unintentionally leaving the boundary of their lane (e.g., due to fatigue or distraction). We conducted a pilot validation study to examine whether drivers would respond to a simulated in-vehicle lane departure warning device in the simulated environment in a similar fashion to how we would expect drivers to respond in the real world. Twenty licensed drivers (aged 18-28 years) completed a 20-minute rural drive in a STISIM Drive® simulator. We randomly assigned participants to control or experimental groups, stratified by gender (4 males, 6 females per group). Experimental participants completed the drive with a simulated lane departure warning device. The device provided auditory feedback (rumble strip sound) when the vehicle’s front left tire approached or crossed the center line, and when the front right tire approached or crossed the edge line at the side of the road. The feedback ceased when the vehicle returned to a more central lane position. Results showed that the lane departure warning device decreased the number of edge line crossings during the simulated drive (p = .03, Cliff’s d = .50) and the number of drivers who crossed the edge line (p = .01, φ. = 2.00). It did not affect participants’ mean lateral lane position, but did decrease the width of lane that drivers used (i.e., the standard deviation of lateral position; p < .001, gadj = 3.85). These results are in accordance with the hypotheses. Contrary to the hypotheses, however, the device did not decrease center line crossings. This may be due to a floor effect; 9 of the 10 control group drivers did not cross the center line. Survey results showed that experimental participants considered this type of device necessary in the real world, appropriate, and effective, and supported the idea of greater implementation; hence, it was socially valid. Overall, the lane departure warning system developed for the STISIM Drive® simulator affected simulated driving in a similar manner to how lane departure warning systems should affect on-road driving.
Keywords: lane departure; simulator validity
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES