Home

Aims and Scope

Instructions for Authors

View Issues & Articles

Editorial Board

Article Search

ATS International Journal
Editor in Chief: Prof. Alessandro Calvi
Address: Via Vito Volterra 62,
00146, Rome, Italy.
Mail to: alessandro.calvi@uniroma3.it

Using electrooculography for glance analysis during simulated driving

L. Morrison, B. Weaver, N.W. Mullen, M. Bédard
Pages: 89-96

Abstract:

We examined the feasibility of using electrooculography (EOG) to monitor eye movements during simulated driving. We created three versions of a driving scenario that differed only in terms of how navigation instructions were provided. Two versions included visual navigation instructions, such as one would get from a global positioning device. In one version, the visual instructions appeared in the lower right corner of the middle screen (GPS group); and in the other, the instructions appeared in the centre of the middle screen, such that drivers did not have to move their eyes from the road to view the instructions. The third version included auditory navigation instructions only. We hypothesized that when visual navigation instructions appeared in the lower right corner of the screen, (1) more time would be spent glancing away from the road, and (2) that this would translate into poorer driving performance. We measured glance presence, and calculated glance latency and length during the three seconds following the onset of 12 randomly selected visual instructions. During this time, participants in the GPS group looked away from the road to the right significantly more often than those in the other two groups. As a result, these participants spent significantly more total time looking away from the road during the drive when compared to the other two groups. Groups did not differ significantly on any of the individual driving mistake categories, or on the total number of driving mistakes. Electrooculography does appear to be a feasible and affordable way to measure eye movement during simulated driving. Our results confirmed that participants spent more time glancing away from the road to the right when visual instructions were given in the lower right hand corner of the screen. Though electrooculography does not provide the same amount or quality of data as head-mounted eye trackers and multiple camera systems, it does yield sufficient data to address questions such as the ones posed in this study.
Keywords: glance analysis electrooculography; simulated driving; distraction; GPS

2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
2023 ISSUES
2022 ISSUES
2021 ISSUES
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
2018 ISSUES
2017 ISSUES
2016 ISSUES
2015 ISSUES
2014 ISSUES
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES