Using electrooculography for glance analysis during simulated driving
L. Morrison, B. Weaver, N.W. Mullen, M. Bédard
Pages: 89-96
Abstract:
We examined the feasibility of using electrooculography (EOG) to monitor eye movements during simulated driving. We created three versions of a driving scenario that differed only in terms of how navigation instructions were provided. Two versions included visual navigation instructions, such as one would get from a global positioning device. In one version, the visual instructions appeared in the lower right corner of the middle screen (GPS group); and in the other, the instructions appeared in the centre of the middle screen, such that drivers did not have to move their eyes from the road to view the instructions. The third version included auditory navigation instructions only. We hypothesized that when visual navigation instructions appeared in the lower right corner of the screen, (1) more time would be spent glancing away from the road, and (2) that this would translate into poorer driving performance. We measured glance presence, and calculated glance latency and length during the three seconds following the onset of 12 randomly selected visual instructions. During this time, participants in the GPS group looked away from the road to the right significantly more often than those in the other two groups. As a result, these participants spent significantly more total time looking away from the road during the drive when compared to the other two groups. Groups did not differ significantly on any of the individual driving mistake categories, or on the total number of driving mistakes. Electrooculography does appear to be a feasible and affordable way to measure eye movement during simulated driving. Our results confirmed that participants spent more time glancing away from the road to the right when visual instructions were given in the lower right hand corner of the screen. Though electrooculography does not provide the same amount or quality of data as head-mounted eye trackers and multiple camera systems, it does yield sufficient data to address questions such as the ones posed in this study.
Keywords: glance analysis electrooculography; simulated driving; distraction; GPS
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES