Dynamic response of reinforced concrete bridges due to heavy vehicles
J.W. Wekezer, P. Szurgott, L. Kwasniewski, E. Taft
Pages: 35-50
Abstract:
The paper presents results of a comprehensive study of structural responses of reinforced, prestressed concrete bridges loaded with moving, heavy trucks. Two-prong approach, consisting of computational mechanics and experimental testing, was used during this project. Several complete vehicle-bridge finite element (FE) models were developed for computational dynamics analysis using LS-DYNA computer code. Three heavy vehicles and three concrete bridges were considered for this study. The FE vehicle models included: a popular tractor-trailer, a moving crane, and a heavy truck with stiff suspension. The bridges with AASHTO type II, III, and IV prestressed reinforced concrete girders and concrete decks were chosen. Experimental testing was conducted on a selected bridge located in the northern part of Florida. The testing program also included a series of tests with permit vehicles traversing standard speed bumps. These tests were designed to verify and validate the vehicle suspension models. Comparison of results from both: computational mechanics and experimental methods allowed for validation and verification of the FE models of the bridges developed. Research output included time histories of accelerations, displacements and strains at selected points of the bridge superstructure. Data obtained allowed for studying a correlation between a vehicle mass, speed, road surface condition and other factors and a resulting dynamic impact factors for the bridges considered. AASHTO defined dynamic load allowance (DLA) were calculated based on strains and displacements data from experiments and from computational mechanics analyses. DLA = 33%, as recommended by AASHTO, was confirmed to be a conservative estimate. Although DLA for bridges depends on the vehicle speed, this relationship was not always directly proportional. It was also found that DLA significantly increased when abutment joints between asphalt pavement and the bridge deck were included in the model. DLA was further amplified when poorly secured truck cargo was modeled with bouncing load, which produced a hammering effect on the bridge. Results of ninety computer simulations with three bridges and three permit vehicles travelling at ten different velocities are shown in the paper.
Keywords: concrete bridge; dynamics; finite element methods; numerical analysis; vibrations
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES