Qualitative analysis of pedestrians’ perception of the urban environment when crossing streets
M.-A. Granié, T. Brenac, M.-C. Montel, C. Coquelet, M. Millot, F. Monti, M. Pannetier
Pages: 17-34
Abstract:
Purpose: Taking all users of the road system into account — notably those who use non-motorized modes of transportation — is a major challenge for urban engineers when designing roads and public spaces. And yet, although a body of knowledge exists concerning the effects of the environment on pedestrian accidentology, so far very little research has been carried out on the perception pedestrians have of the road environment (structure of buildings, vegetation, etc.) and its influence on decision-making when crossing. This exploratory research aims at studying this perception through a qualitative approach. Methods: We used the focus group method to study the perception of 20 two-way street environments with a certain level of diversity from the point of view of buildings (type, density, and heterogeneity), activities, position in relation to the city center, width of the sidewalks and type of traffic. The participants in the two focus groups were 11 regular or occasional pedestrians. Results: The verbal material obtained is analyzed in terms of perception of the environment, inferences about driver behavior (notably toward pedestrians), and influence on the pedestrian crossing behavior. Pedestrians prefer environments in which they have the “upper hand” or environments that are highly predictable. Conclusions: The results suggest a few tendencies or lines of approach concerning the design of spaces that make street crossing more comfortable for pedestrians. They also show that the focus group method is of great interest for studying the perception and interpretation of urban environments.
Keywords: pedestrian; environment; perception; focus group; road crossing behavior; road design
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES