Calibrating microscopic traffic simulation models using speed-flow data
L. Gong, W. Fan, M. Yu, E.M. Washing
Pages: 7-22
Abstract:
Calibrating a micro-simulation model is an important step that precedes implementing the model into engineering practice or academic research. Compared with other measures of effectiveness (MOE), such as traffic delay or volume, using speed-flow data as the MOE has the following advantages: (1) The speed-flow data can be easily requested from local Traffic Management Centre, and thus, financial expenditure associated with data collecting can be reduced; (2) The speed-flow plot contains traffic flow information related to different traffic states and a higher number of parameters can be exposed to the calibration process. However, there are still some issues related to calibrating micro-simulation model using speed-flow data: (1) How to determine a reasonable raster resolution of the speed-flow plot; (2) Bias resulted from using the area of the cells occupied by speed-flow data as the MOE; (3) How to set the free-flow speed (FFS) distribution in the simulation model. In order to address these issues, the relationship between the raster resolution and the number of the cells occupied by speed-flow points and the area of these cells was analysed. A trade-off was observed and was used to determine a reasonable raster resolution. Data frequency information was incorporated into the MOE to refine the original 2-D MOE. In addition, four scenarios were designed in this study to identify the impact of various FFS distribution setting criteria. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed methodology, a case study was conducted using the micro-simulation software package VISSIM and MATLAB. The result manifests the effectiveness of the proposed methods.
Keywords: traffic simulation; model calibration; speed-flow plot; VISSIM
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES