Evaluating traffic safety and performance effects of countdown timers on signalized intersections: a driving simulator study
W. van Haperen, A. Pirdavani, T. Brijs, T. Bellemans
Pages: 7-22
Abstract:
During the last few years application of numerical countdown timers on traffic lights has become more popular. However, there are only a handful of scientific studies that explored the performance of such system. These studies often report contradicting results, most probably due to different driving cultures. Within the context of this study, a comparative analysis was conducted between three different configurations, namely “without countdown timers”, “with entire phase countdown timers” and “with final-stage countdown timers”, in which both traffic safety and traffic performance aspects were analyzed. Since no countdown timers have yet been implemented in Belgium, the driving simulator approach was selected to simulate individuals’ behavior and different conditions’ implications. The sample population consisted of individuals who were in possession of a valid driver's license and that were accustomed to the Belgian driving culture. In total, 49 test subjects participated in the experiment. The simulation experiment comprised of six unique conditions, in which the different traffic light configurations were combined with a dilemma zone and a red-on-approach scenario. The results showed that the amount of stopping decisions increased when countdown timers were installed, indicating that improper early-stop ratios increased. No aggressive accelerations were measured for either one of the configurations, but the deceleration behavior showed that stopped drivers for the “entire phase countdown” already decreased their speed up to 150 meters in advance of the intersection. Furthermore, both countdown timers were able to more than halve the maximum applied braking force of the no timer conditions. With regard to the red phase scenarios, the results showed a statistical significant decrease of reaction times and start-up lost times of around 1.40 and 1.25 seconds compared to no timing conditions. No significant difference between the types of countdown timing was found.
Keywords: countdown timers; dilemma zone; signalized intersections; start-up lost time; traffic flow efficiency; traffic safety
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES