Understanding the factors associated with severity of aging population-involved pedestrian crashes in Florida
A.E. Kitali, T. Sando, E.E. Ozguven, R. Moses
Pages: 85-98
Abstract:
When involved in a vehicle-pedestrian collision, aging pedestrians are prone to a higher injury severity risk due to their reduced physical and cognitive abilities, compared to younger pedestrians. The main objective of this study was to identify main factors associated with injury severity of aging pedestrians involved in pedestrian-vehicle crashes. A binary logistic model was developed using five-year (2009-2013) pedestrian crash dataset archived by the Florida Department of Transportation. The model described the relation between injury severity of aging pedestrians and various explanatory variables. Principal Component Analysis was used as a decision tool for selecting independent variables to include in the model. Further, predictive margins plots were used as a decision tool for converting some continuous variables to categorical variables. The following factors were found to significantly increase the injury severity of aging pedestrians; crash factors (alcohol involvement of driver/pedestrian, vehicle movement), geometric factors (higher maximum posted speed, presence of curve and up/down grade, non-curbed shoulders), and environmental factors (poor lighting conditions). Conversely, the increase in shoulder width resulted in lower injury severity. Understanding of key determinants that influence aging pedestrian injury severity may allow for the identification of measures to improve aging pedestrians walking environments on roadways, thus enhancing their operational and safety experience on the road. Based on the findings of this research, several countermeasures have been recommended. The proposed countermeasures take a holistic safety improvement strategy that encompasses all four E’s of highway safety, i.e., engineering, education, enforcement, and emergency services.
Keywords: aging population; injury severity; pedestrians
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES