Evaluation of truck and agricultural vehicle behavior at reduced conflict intersections
S. Hallmark, N. Hawkins, R. Thapa, S. Knickerbocker
Pages: 15-24
Abstract:
In the US, some states have begun to address rural high-speed intersection crashes by physically restricting minor-road crossing movements to simplify driver decision-making in terms of gap acceptance. These treatments are referred to in Minnesota (USA) as reduced conflict intersections (RCIs). Introduction of RCI design has been successful in preventing severe crashes; however, the unusual design has been met with some apprehension from operators of agricultural equipment and large trucks. In particular concerns have been raised that, as large trucks are required to make U-turn maneuvers, they occupy the travel lanes for longer than would be required for a left-turn or through maneuver from the minor road, and, consequently, are exposed to on-coming high-speed vehicles for longer. In response to these concerns, this paper summarizes results of a study which collected and evaluated large vehicle operational behavior at three rural RCI intersections in Minnesota and three similar non-RCI intersections, which were proximate to the RCI intersections. Data were collected in 2015 using a portable video trailer array. Exposure time, evasive maneuvers, and other metrics were compared between RCI and regular intersections. Exposure time was calculated at both the intersections. Results show that large trucks are exposed 4 to 10 seconds longer while making a through or left turn maneuver at control intersections than they are making a U-turn. The average number of evasive maneuvers per large vehicle at either the merge or U-turn location were much lower than for the control intersection. This is significant since most agencies had concerns about the U-turn creating additional evasive maneuvers. Queue time and travel time were also compared. Gap acceptance behavior shows that minor stream vehicles are more likely responsible for evasive maneuvers of on-coming high-speed vehicles even for the larger accepted gap size at control intersections compared to merge and U-turn sections.
Keywords: alternative intersections; large vehicles; road safety; reduced conflict intersection
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES