Subjective quantification of access to public transit: an exercise in choice modeling
D. Mishra, A.K. Sarkar
Pages: 121-134
Abstract:
Accessibility to a public transit system (PTS) is an important aspect of transport planning process that has garnered little attention from researchers. In the context of developing countries, the ability to access a PTS which generally depends on the availability of a feeder service can prove to be crucial for the sustainability of the service. Planners may also benefit from including subjectivity to the process of modelling choice as it has largely remained dependent on objective measures. For fulfilling these two aims, this study introduces a fuzzy weighted average measure employing temporal impedances and commuter attributed value for the impedances to quantify access to a PTS. Binary Logistic Regression is used for developing two choice models to study the role of the defined access in influencing commuter choice behaviour. Data for the study were gathered with an onboard questionnaire survey on a bus rapid transit system introduced in Indore, India in 2013. The questionnaire collected data for socioeconomic demographics as well as travel-related parameters in a revealed preference experiment. Stated preference data were also gathered for validating the developed models. A comparison drawn between the results and performance of the models (with and without fuzzy access measure) shows that adding subjectivity improves the predictive accuracy of the model. Also, access to a PTS was shown to influence the choice behaviour of commuters significantly. Results from a sensitivity analysis for assessing the impact of individual access parameters suggest that waiting time at feeder stops and in-vehicle travel time weigh significantly on the shifting behaviour of the commuters.
Keywords: public transit; access; logistic regression; fuzzy weighted average; sensitivity; statistical analysis
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES