Home

Aims and Scope

Instructions for Authors

View Issues & Articles

Editorial Board

Article Search

ATS International Journal
Editor in Chief: Prof. Alessandro Calvi
Address: Via Vito Volterra 62,
00146, Rome, Italy.
Mail to: alessandro.calvi@uniroma3.it

Reactions at intersections of drivers with Alzheimer’s disease: the association between neuropsychological assessment and driving errors in a driving simulator

C. Saber, M. Armstrong, A. Stinchcombe, S. Yamin, S. Gagnon
Pages: 77-86

Abstract:

Driving maneuvers that require increased cognitive load may be more systematically impaired than global driving ability in drivers with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Because navigating an intersection is a demanding on road event, errors seen in this context might be more sensitive and indicative of the extent of cognitive changes seen in drivers with AD. The objective of this study is to explore the associations between neuropsychological test outcomes and driving simulator performance at intersections. Seventeen English speaking older adults with a diagnosis of mild AD were recruited from a hospital-based memory clinic. Twenty-one neurologically healthy control participants were also recruited as age-matched control participants. Neuropsychological measures were administered to all participants prior to completing two simulated driving scenarios. Errors at intersections were examined using a systematic scoring system to classify all errors made during preparation, execution, or at recovery. In contrast to our previously published data, one global measure of cognition (the Mini Mental State Exam; MMSE) was significantly associated with driver errors, specifically while coping with intersections. Errors of preparation and execution at intersections were significantly associated with MMSE scores for AD drivers. This suggests that the more fine-grained evaluation of driver behaviour at intersections, relative to overall driving simulator performance, may provide further insight into the cognitive challenges that drivers with AD experience. The systematic approach to analysing intersections presented here allows for greater sensitivity in identifying important differences in driver behaviour. This evaluation scheme provides a novel approach to evaluate driver behaviour and allows for the calculation of the frequency of errors according to type and when they occur in the intersection. Further, insofar as we are concerned with fitness to drive, the cognitive challenges experienced by AD drivers may be better captured by this highly specific approach when compared to other variables of overall driving performance.
Keywords: driving; dementia; intersections; neuropsychological assessments; simulation

2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
2023 ISSUES
2022 ISSUES
2021 ISSUES
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
2018 ISSUES
2017 ISSUES
2016 ISSUES
2015 ISSUES
2014 ISSUES
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES