Reactions at intersections of drivers with Alzheimer’s disease: the association between neuropsychological assessment and driving errors in a driving simulator
C. Saber, M. Armstrong, A. Stinchcombe, S. Yamin, S. Gagnon
Pages: 77-86
Abstract:
Driving maneuvers that require increased cognitive load may be more systematically impaired than global driving ability in drivers with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Because navigating an intersection is a demanding on road event, errors seen in this context might be more sensitive and indicative of the extent of cognitive changes seen in drivers with AD. The objective of this study is to explore the associations between neuropsychological test outcomes and driving simulator performance at intersections. Seventeen English speaking older adults with a diagnosis of mild AD were recruited from a hospital-based memory clinic. Twenty-one neurologically healthy control participants were also recruited as age-matched control participants. Neuropsychological measures were administered to all participants prior to completing two simulated driving scenarios. Errors at intersections were examined using a systematic scoring system to classify all errors made during preparation, execution, or at recovery. In contrast to our previously published data, one global measure of cognition (the Mini Mental State Exam; MMSE) was significantly associated with driver errors, specifically while coping with intersections. Errors of preparation and execution at intersections were significantly associated with MMSE scores for AD drivers. This suggests that the more fine-grained evaluation of driver behaviour at intersections, relative to overall driving simulator performance, may provide further insight into the cognitive challenges that drivers with AD experience. The systematic approach to analysing intersections presented here allows for greater sensitivity in identifying important differences in driver behaviour. This evaluation scheme provides a novel approach to evaluate driver behaviour and allows for the calculation of the frequency of errors according to type and when they occur in the intersection. Further, insofar as we are concerned with fitness to drive, the cognitive challenges experienced by AD drivers may be better captured by this highly specific approach when compared to other variables of overall driving performance.
Keywords: driving; dementia; intersections; neuropsychological assessments; simulation
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES