Characterizing instabilities induced by a four degree-of-freedom all-terrain vehicle simulator
J. Michael, C. Jennissen, G. Denning, S. Rahmatalla
Pages: 85-96
Abstract:
All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) are used widely across the globe for both recreational and occupational purposes. In the U.S. alone, they are associated with approximately 650 deaths and 400,000 total injuries per year. Although specifically designed for off-road use, about three-fifths of ATV-related fatalities occur on public roads, and at least 70% of roadway crashes are not traffic-related. In order to study and better understand the mechanisms that lead to instability and loss of control, a four degree-of-freedom, human in the loop ATV simulator was developed and integrated with a tilt/vibration platform in a real-time interaction. The simulator allowed the study of each individual’s approach to traversing a terrain. Inertial measurement devices were placed on the ATV and platform, and were used to determine acceleration and angular velocity of subjects. The ATV was instrumented with 32 sensors to detect reaction forces applied to the machine at the feet, hands, saddle, and seat. A five-camera motion capture system was used to track posture. Analysis of data showed that a cycle of instability and stability existed as moments of sudden input accelerations caused reactions in the spine and head. Furthermore, component accelerations were analyzed to identify the acceleration of the subject relative to the ATV. The cycle and the time from input acceleration to bracing on the ATV to regain stability served as a baseline for the subject’s reaction to input acceleration and the time between input acceleration and regaining stability. During instability events, peak forces were delayed from the input by as much as 0.5 seconds. In conclusion, a simulator provides a safe, controlled means to study factors that might cause instability. Future investigations comparing data from experienced, adult operators to those with known risk factors could lead to interventions that decrease loss of ATV control and subsequent injury.
Keywords: all-terrain vehicles; simulation; vulnerable road users; instability; active riding; road safety
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES