Estimating free flow speed using Google Maps API: accuracy, limitations, and applications
A. Alsobky, R. Mousa
Pages: 49-64
Abstract:
The Free-Flow Speed (FFS) is a key parameter used extensively in traffic analysis and in developing both macroscopic and microscopic transportation models. FFS is always recommended to be measured at site, and this poses a problem of time, cost, effort, risk, and associated logistics. This paper presents a new approach for estimating the FFS by making use of the Application Programming Interface (API) for Google Maps. In particular, the proposed approach utilizes free travel times (FTT) obtained through Google Maps API (GMAPI). Data from GMAPI were compared with similar data collected using Moving Car/GPS on major roads in Greater Cairo in Egypt. Roads were divided into distinct segments considering the minimum length of segment on each road. All data were collected during free traffic flow conditions. Comparison and statistical tests of paired two samples confirmed the high accuracy of FTT and FFS values obtained from GMAPI. Three applications were presented in this paper utilizing the estimated FFS values. First, the legal speed limit was evaluated against the free-flow speed, and odd segments were identified for further actions. Second, sharp curves on a major road were evaluated for design consistency and results confirmed the possibility of improving safety conditions on such road. Third, FTT and FFS values obtained from GMAPI were utilized in developing the transportation model for a medium-size city in Egypt, especially in coding and validating the road network. The network validation results ensured that FTT and FFS values obtained from GMAPI can lead to robust transportation models. The general findings of this research promise more applications of Google Maps API in various traffic applications.
Keywords: free-flow speed; operating speed; 85th percentile speed; posted speed; design speed; Google Maps API
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES