Analysis of total cost of ownership for conventional and alternative vehicle technologies: evidence from France
K. Flaris, L. Mitropoulos, K. Kepaptsoglou, K. Kouretas, E. Vlahogianni
Pages: 153-166
Abstract:
Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) have been in the market for over 10 years; however, their market diffusion has been slow despite their environmental and social advantages. Their high purchase cost is one of the most significant barriers towards their wider adoption. Policy makers have used the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) estimate to expose the lower fuel and maintenance cost of BEVs relative to gasoline-based vehicles. In this paper, a model is developed for private consumers on the principles of the TCO that assesses different vehicle technologies and incorporates the consumers’ preferences when purchasing a new vehicle. The TCO model is applied on three representative vehicle technologies, including an Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle (ICEV), a Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) and a BEV; for three vehicle classes (i.e., small, medium and SUV), resulting in the assessment of nine vehicle models. The TCO is quantified by using data for France. A weighted TCO per vehicle is also estimated by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to incorporate the consumers’ preference on TCO parameters. The TCO and the Weighted Average Cost (WAC) estimates for each vehicle are used to assess the nine vehicle models and compare results. The ICEV has the lowest TCO for the small and medium classes, while the BEV is ranked as the most economic vehicle for the SUV class. As the WAC is greatly influenced by the purchase cost, vehicle rankings change for only one class. Our method suggests that a dynamic TCO should capture consumers’ preferences and support policy makers to adjust incentives at local level.
Keywords: total cost of ownership; electric vehicles; consumer preference; hybrid vehicles
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES