Assessment of park and ride acceptability of users in developing countries using discrete choice experiment
L. Perera, N. Jayasooriya, G. Rajapaksha
Pages: 235-250
Abstract:
A light rail transit system (LRT) has been proposed for the city of Colombo as a solution to traffic congestion and the first LRT line is under design stage. This proposed LRT is expecting a major mode shift from private vehicle users to LRT and thus integration of private to public mode (mainly cars to LRT) is essential for LRT to sustain. To reinforce this integration, a Park and Ride (P&R) system is proposed, which is a commonly used and well-accepted strategy in most cities around the world. However, application of this P&R concept was failed in Colombo, Sri Lanka in the past when implemented to promote bus transit due to various reasons. Therefore, there is a big question mark whether a park and ride facility would help to attract more private vehicle users to LRT in Colombo. This study is focused on assessing the effect of a park and ride facility in conjunction with the new Light Rail transportation, especially what parameters are predominant to attract more users. A Discrete Choice Experiment was used to evaluate potential users’ choice. This experiment has revealed that potential users are more concerned about travel time savings and walking distance, while parking availability is also a significant factor with less probability. Travel cost savings and LRT frequency found to be trivial. To attract more users for a P&R among those who make short trips, walking distance to the parking facility is a crucial parameter to consider in the planning stage. The results of this study shed the light on key parameters that need to be considered when planning park and ride facilities as a supporting infrastructure to enhance the demand for new LRT lines.
Keywords: park and ride; LRT; discrete choice; public transport; modal shift
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES