Individual barriers, requirements, and attitudes towards mode choice among low income older adults: case study of Dallas, Texas
K. Hyun, R. Subedi, K. Lee, J. Harwerth, N. Oran Gibson, C. Krejci
Pages: 107-126
Abstract:
Mobility disparities among older adults affect their ability to travel and access services. This study sought to understand what forms of assistance or educational strategies can fill the varying mobility gaps and meet the mobility needs of low income older adults by investigating their transportation activities and perceived barriers in Dallas, Texas. This study characterized older adults’ use of existing and potential transportation options, including conventional transit, paratransit, and ride-hailing systems, based on surveys collected from 146 low income older adults in Dallas, Texas. Using the survey data, we conducted a Latent Class Cluster Analysis to understand low income older adults’ mode choice decisions, which included current uses and adoption likelihoods based on their perceived barriers to existing mobility options and socioeconomic characteristics. Results characterized three distinct mode choice patterns including car-dependent, transit-dependent, and private mixed modes users. Those who drive showed their heavy reliance on a personal vehicle with little to no interest in other transportation modes. The transit-dependent group indicated financial difficulties and lacked knowledge of technology while demonstrating a very low adoption likelihood for ride-hailing services. The private mixed mode group representing those who either drive or rely on their family or friends for a ride exhibited a variety of barriers and concerns about the existing modes but were open to adopt public and para-transit. Based on the findings, we discussed several strategies that can potentially reduce observed barriers and challenges, and enhance mobility to ultimately increase social equity across transportation-disadvantaged populations, particularly among low income older adults.
Keywords: low income older adults; mode choice; barriers; adoption; latent class cluster analysis
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES