Simulation-based capacity estimation and speed-drop analysis of on-ramp merging sections in a corridor with mixed traffic stream
A. Budhkar, A. Maji
Pages: 23-38
Abstract:
Understanding on-ramp merging process is important for effective planning, design and operations of the on-ramp merging area. Mixed traffic streams with varying vehicle sizes and maneuverability, and lack of lane-discipline leading to lateral interactions are common in developing countries. Available studies on on-ramp merging operations in mixed traffic streams did not explore the effect of traffic composition and merging section geometry on the capacity and speed drops in the merging area. In this study, field data collected from the on-ramp merging section of an urban highway was used to develop a calibrated and validated microsimulation model. The model calibration involved optimizing conflict area and car-following parameters, and validation included comparing the model performance with another section on the same corridor. The calibrated model was used to evaluate the capacity and speed drops in the merging area for 600 scenarios representing various combinations of vehicle compositions, flow rates, merging section lengths, and mainline and on-ramp widths. Scenarios simulated for three hours with and without on-ramp traffic revealed merge area length, truck composition in mainline, merging traffic flows, and width of mainline and on-ramp as the statistically significant factors. The capacity dropped about 15% for mainlines with two, three, and four lanes. A second-order polynomial speed drop model developed from the simulation data indicated optimum merging section length of 100 m for mainline with two lanes and 150 m or more for mainlines with three and four lanes. The speed drop is maximum at about 1400 PCU/h/lane mainline flow and monotonically increase with ramp flow.
Keywords: on-ramp merging; capacity drop; speed drop; mixed traffic stream; urban highway
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES