Investigating the accuracy rate of vehicle-vehicle conflicts by LIDAR technology and microsimulation in VISSIM and AIMSUN
A. Ansariyar, A. Taherpour
Pages: 37-52
Abstract:
Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology is a remote sensing technique which can be applied to determine the spectral signature and differential position of objects emitting radiation. In order to collect real-time traffic data in a signalized intersection, the LIDAR sensor was installed at Cold Spring Ln – Hillen Rd intersection in Baltimore city, USA. The installed LIDAR sensor can record the “Post Encroachment Time Threshold (PET)” and Time-to-Collision (TTC) indicators as two principal safety measurements between two motorized vehicles (including car-car, car-bus, car-truck, and bus-truck). PET implies a potential danger, while TTC describes an imminent danger. The study aims to investigate the accuracy of obtained PET and TTC from the Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM), which is a software application developed by the FHWA, and compare it with the results obtained using LIDAR technology. SSAM is a free open-source software to perform statistical analysis of vehicle trajectory data output from microscopic traffic simulation models. Hereupon, the intersection was modeled in VISSIM and AIMSUN, and the outputs of vehicles trajectories by microsimulation were imported to SSAM software to compute a number of surrogate measures of safety for each conflict. The results highlighted that 857, 966, and 959 conflicts were obtained by LIDAR sensor, VISSIM, and AIMSUN respectively in the same time interval. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) measure was used for evaluating the accuracy rate, and the result showed that the TTC and PET values by the trajectory of AIMSUN are 34% and 26% more accurate than TTC and PET values by the trajectory of VISSIM, respectively.
Keywords: LIDAR sensor; Post Encroachment Time threshold (PET); Time-to-Collision (TTC); vehicle-vehicle conflicts; Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM); Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) measure
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES