Optimized design of roadside trees based on the risk analysis of occupant injuries in traffic accidents
R. Cheng, Y. Pan, Y. Huang, Q. Xu
Pages: 3-16
Abstract:
To reduce occupant injuries in collisions between vehicles and roadside trees, this paper introduces the acceleration severity index (ASI) as an indicator of occupant injury risks and uses the vehicle dynamics simulation software PC-crash to carry out offset crash tests of vehicles and trees along the roadside. The recommended diameter of roadside trees with the minimum ASI is given by collecting various ASI data corresponding to different vehicle departure speeds and slope gradients, and the multivariate models of vehicle departure speeds, slope gradients and diameters of roadside trees, as well as the minimum ASI, are fitted. In the case of the minimum ASI >1, by further adjustment of the diameter of roadside trees, the calculation method of the distance to trees is proposed, and the optimized design schemes of the roadside tree diameter and spacing with the minimum ASI ≤1 for different vehicle departure speeds and slope gradients are given. The results show that the vehicle departure speed is positively logarithmic to the recommended diameter of roadside trees and is positively exponential to the minimum ASI. The slope gradients are approximately positively linearly correlated with the tree recommended diameter and minimum ASI. When the slope gradients are 1:6.5~1:3.5 with a vehicle departure speed of 100 km/h~120 km/h, when the slope gradients are 1:2.5 with a vehicle departure speed of 90 km/h~120 km/h, and when the slope gradients are 1:1.5 with a vehicle departure speed of 80 km/h~120 km/h, the corresponding minimum ASI >1, which indicates that the severity of roadside accidents exceeds the limit that an occupant can endure.
Keywords: roadside tree; diameter and spacing; acceleration severity index; PC-crash; roadside accident
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES