Road rage recognition model for truck drivers based on K-means clustering and random forest algorithm
Y. Xiao, Y. Liu, Z.J. Liang
Pages: 293-306
Abstract:
Road rage during driving have an essential impact on driving safety. With the aim of effectively identifying road rage in truck drivers, a driver anger scale (DAS) for truck drivers is developed based on the feature of truck drivers, and 400 valid questionnaires are collected from professional truck drivers. Next, by means of a K-means++ algorithm, truck drivers are divided into two types: high and low road rage. Finally, a road rage recognition model is established based on a random forest (RF) algorithm, the interpretable machine learning framework SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) is introduced to extract the important influencing factors of road rage, and the features of road rage in truck drivers are further explored. The results show that the recognition accuracy of road rage based on the RF model is 76.3%, the recall rate is 92.5%, and the F1-score is 83.6%. Compared with decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM) and K-nearest neighbor (KNN), the recognition performance of the RF road rage recognition model is more reliable and stable. The important influencing variables on road rage are the driving environment, driving duration, driving experience, and violation frequency. The degree of road rage in truck drivers in a daytime driving environment is significantly higher than that at night. Driving experience is significantly negatively correlated with road rage, and truck drivers who are prone to fatigue driving and have a high frequency of traffic violations have a higher degree of road rage. These findings provide important insights into managing road rage among truck drivers, helping to develop effective strategies to reduce road rage and to enhance road transport safety.
Keywords: traffic safety; truck drivers; road rage recognition; random forest; feature analysis
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES