Sight distance assessment on left horizontal curves over crest vertical curves on divided highways through reliability-based analysis
V. Matragos, F. Fotos, K. Apostoleris, S. Mavromatis
Pages: 189-202
Abstract:
This paper delivers a realistic representation of the Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) adequacy investigation for cases of left horizontal curves over crest vertical curves on divided highways. The research is based on geometric control parameters set by the German Design Guidelines (RAA, 2008). The authors extend previous research of theirs based on an algorithm that calculates the available and demanded SSD (ASD, SSD, respectively). SSD assessments were performed through 5 road geometric parameters, namely, speed (V), horizontal radius (R), crest vertical curvature rate (Hk), entry grade (s1) and exit grade (s2). In general, major SSD inadequacy areas were found to be associated with high speeds (120km/h and 130km/h). In total, approximately 590,000 alignments were examined. Such an excessive data amount was efficient for the authors to perform a reliability analysis approach, by expressing the percentage of non-compliance for cases with SSD inadequacy. In order to assess more thoroughly the undesired cases where SSD>ASD, and quantify the frequency and intensity of SSD inadequacy, a new factor was introduced: the ratio of overlap, defined as the ratio of crest vertical curve length without the required Stopping Sight Distance (SSD). The results can be categorized and presented in color coded presentations, where the designer of compound highway sections can understand the degree of the required geometric interventions in order to achieve SSD adequacy. However, prior to implementing the proposed methodology, the approach should be also examined in relation to crash databases, where a more clear view of the situation can be obtained.
Keywords: stopping sight distance; crest vertical curves; left horizontal curves; reliability analysis; percentage of non-compliance; color coded presentation
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES