Examining the takeover process for senior drivers in conditionally Automated Vehicles
W. Ding, Y. Murzello, S. Samuel, S. Cao
Pages: 127-140
Abstract:
While the consensus suggests that autonomous control is particularly advantageous for older drivers due to reduced driving workload, the challenges brought on by the takeover process may impose additional burdens on this cohort. This study aims to explore the takeover time and takeover quality of older drivers, examining how different driving conditions affect their performance compared to young and middle-aged drivers. By doing so, it seeks to pinpoint potential risks specific to this demographic segment. Seventy-two participants from three age groups— younger, middle-aged, and older drivers—were recruited, each completing eight takeover scenarios. This study addresses a gap in age-related takeover studies, which predominantly target young-old age drivers (65-74 years old), by focusing specifically on the old-old age group (75 + years old) characterized by heightened cognitive impairments. The result revealed that older drivers have significantly higher takeover time and lower takeover quality compared to younger and middle-aged groups. Older drivers exhibited greater use of acceleration and brake more frequently after takeover, and they had significantly higher lateral drifting. Furthermore, the non-driving related tasks distract older drivers more compared to drivers from other age groups. Highway and local roads, as well as curved and straight roads, affect drivers across all age groups similarly. The findings suggest that older drivers encounter enhanced challenges during the takeover process, particularly when non-driving-related tasks were presented during the automation control. Although automation provides convenience to older people, attention should be directed towards mitigating the additional risks associated with takeovers. This conclusion contributes valuable insights for the future customized design of takeover requests tailored to older drivers.
Keywords: takeover time; takeover quality; conditionally automated driving; older driver
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES