How the position of a cycle lane installed on an urban residential street impacts on the behaviour of young drivers
A. Portera, L. Tefa, M. Bassani
Pages: 91-104
Abstract:
In this driving simulation study, we evaluated the change in driver behaviour of forty young drivers (20 females) following the conversion of a 2 way local street into a 1 way one with a cycle lane in a typical residential neighbourhood. Twenty drivers who were also used to commuting/travelling by bicycle were selected for the study. We compared three road layouts: (i) a standard 2-way urban street with no cycle lane (baseline), (ii) a 1-way street with a cycle lane on the right side, and (iii) a 1-way street with a left side cycle lane. Driver behavioural metrics when interacting with cyclists including overtaking speed, lateral position in the lane, and vehicle-cyclist clearance were analysed using linear mixed-effect models. Speed and lateral position in the lane were also analysed in the non-overtaking phase. Significantly better driver behaviour was observed in layouts with a dedicated cycle lane, manifesting itself in greater lateral distance values for safer overtaking and better trajectory control. Drivers were more likely to stay within their lanes, eliminating the need to alter trajectory when passing cyclists, thus promoting better longitudinal and lateral control. The presence of a cycle lane significantly improves the interaction between drivers and cyclists, regardless of the position of the cycle lane, i.e., left vs. right side with respect to the vehicle lane. While the results do not favour a particular side, designers should also consider cyclist preferences and driver expectations at intersections. Further research is crucial to validate findings and explore lane positioning effects near intersections, and greater emphasis should be placed on determining cyclist preferences in terms of infrastructure design.
Keywords: cyclist safety; cycle lane; driving simulation; safety measurements; vehicle-bicycle interaction
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES