Merging public transport networks into one: the case of the city of Tver
S. Razumovskii
Pages: 41-54
Abstract:
The study explores the dynamics of public transport regulation, deregulation, and reform within the context of Tver in Russia. As developing nations face increased transportation demand and industrialized regions grapple with environmental concerns policymakers are challenged to choose appropriate regulatory frameworks. Historically, different stages of economic development have led to diverse approaches, ranging from publicly owned enterprises to natural monopoly regulation. Primary objective of the study is to conduct a spatial analysis of the new public transport route network in Tver and its suburb, examining alterations, accessibility, and travel times. To achieve this, methodologies, and data parameters such as Geographic Information System (GIS) tools for spatial analysis, creation of buffer zones around public transport stops to assess accessibility, population coverage analysis to understand the demographic impact, and isochrones mapping to evaluate changes in travel times and accessibility were employed. These methods allowed for a detailed assessment of the network's alterations, accessibility, and the impact on travel times following the transfer of planning authority. Additionally, population access to transport services was assessed through demographic coverage analysis, determining the proportion of the population within a designated distance from stops. These quantifications provided insights into the effects of transferring planning authority on the regional public transport system's accessibility and efficiency. Tver's experience illustrates the potential outcomes of transport reform, with intracity and intraregional routes merged into a unified passenger transportation system. This transformation holds promise for regional development. In summary, this study offers insights into public transport regulation and reform dynamics, using the Tver case to analyze the consequences for accessibility and service quality.
Keywords: public transport; city bus; spatial analysis; transport operator; route network
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES