On-ramp mixed traffic flow merging model with connected and autonomous vehicles
X.Y. Kuang, H.B. Xiao, X.L. Huan
Pages: 159-176
Abstract:
The impacts of merging on mixed traffic flow in the highway on-ramp zone are numerically investigated in this paper. An on-ramp mixed traffic flow merging model is proposed. Our model focuses on the on-ramp merging zone and considers a mixed traffic flow comprising of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) and human-driven vehicles (HDVs). Firstly, we establish the Velocity-Modified Comfortable Driving (V-MCD) model for HDVs, which incorporates a velocity estimation module into the base Modified Comfortable Driving (MCD) model. The Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) model developed by PATH Labs is used for CAVs. A cooperative merging model has been developed to capture the interaction behavior of vehicles in various driving scenarios. Merging rules are established based on vehicle type and merging order. The merging rules for HDV-HDV are based on safety gap. Meanwhile, those for CAV-HDV are based on velocity difference, and for CAV-CAV are based on first-come-first-served. We conduct numerical simulation experiments to derive the fundamental diagram of the mixed flow and analyze the interaction between vehicles on the on-ramp and mainline. The simulation results indicate that the V-MCD model can effectively reflect on the hysteresis effect caused by on-ramp merging vehicles in real traffic scenarios. The increase in CAV penetration improves road traffic efficiency in terms of both traffic velocity and capacity. However, as the penetration of CAVs continues to rise, their positive impact will diminish. The sensitivity analysis of the hysteresis effect at both micro and macro levels can enhance our understanding of the impacts on traffic flow. As the hysteresis effect increases, merging has a greater impact on mainline upstream traffic, leading to reduce headway and more erratic velocity changes.
Keywords: on-ramp merging; mixed traffic flow; connected and autonomous vehicles; cooperative merging model; cellular automaton
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES