Performance evaluation of Queue Jump Lane using microsimulation in VISSIM
K. Maddu, S. Jena
Pages: 223-240
Abstract:
In India, buses play a pivotal role in public transportation, yet commuters often face delays in their daily travels. To address this, Queue Jump Lane (QJL) interventions at intersections have been proposed. Existing studies focus on reducing bus delays, often at the expense of increased travel times for non-priority vehicles, and predominantly consider homogeneous traffic conditions. This study aims to identify an optimal QJL scenario, evaluating its performance across varying Volume-to-Capacity (v/c) ratios to minimize bus travel time while causing minimal disruptions to other modes of transportation. Conducting research in Guwahati, a city with mixed traffic conditions, data on road geometry, traffic signals, and vehicular characteristics were collected from two signalized intersections. Using VISSIM software, a Traffic Microsimulation Model (TMM) was developed to simulate Priority Scenarios (PS) representing various QJL configurations, including bus advance areas and pre-signals. The model underwent calibration through sensitivity analysis, employing One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and validation based on the Root Mean Square Normalized Error (RMSNE) using Traffic volume as the Measure of Effectiveness (MOE). Simulation results highlight that PS10, incorporating a curb-side QJL with pre-signal, a fully utilized 75m bus advance area, and a nearside bus stop, can be able to reduce bus travel time by 39% with minimal impact on non-priority vehicles. However, PS10's efficiency diminishes when v/c ratios exceed 1. This study provides valuable insights for transport planners and practitioners, assisting in the selection and implementation of optimal QJL scenarios tailored to specific intersections and prevailing v/c ratios. This research contributes to enhancing public transportation efficiency while considering the complexities of mixed traffic conditions.
Keywords: VISSIM; queue jump lane; microsimulation; priority scenarios; v/c ratio
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES