Safety and operational impacts of different Autonomous Vehicle operations on freeway work zones
V.K. Maddineni, M. Ansarinejad, M.M. Ahmed
Pages: 117-126
Abstract:
The emergence of new Connected and Autonomous Technology (CAT) has led to significant enhancements in operational efficiency and safety within the realm of transportation. Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) have demonstrated the ability to form platoons, thereby increasing the freeway capacity and reducing fuel consumption. While numerous studies advocate for dedicated lanes for platoons, the transitional phase would encompass mixed traffic conditions and this could decrease safety and operational efficiency on freeways, particularly on sections with work zones and freeway weaving regions. The study conducted safety performance evaluations on an Interstate-80 (I-80) freeway segment. By utilizing the concept of moving work zones and establishing continuous one-mile work zones through the designated segment, the study assessed the impact of work zone placement on vehicle platoons across interchanges and exit ramps. The study particularly made a comparison between two AV behaviors Cooperative AV and AV platooning. To conduct safety evaluations surrogate safety conflict indicator Time to Collision (TTC) was selected and traffic conflicts after the simulations were extracted by utilizing Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM) tool. Lane change parameters in the simulation platform for human-driven vehicles were updated based on NDS SHRP2 data for clear weather, while those for Cooperative AV and AV platooning scenarios were updated by findings from Co-Exist. While both Cooperative AV and AV platooning scenarios exhibited reduced number of traffic conflicts compared to human-driven counterparts, differences emerged in the types of conflicts. AV platooning scenario exhibited a higher percentage of rear-end conflicts than AV cooperative. By leveraging traffic conflict indicator TTC, this research provided valuable insights for traffic agencies and infrastructure owners and operators (IOOs) to implement work zones safely across different freeway sections within the emerging AV environment.
Keywords: microsimulation; AV behavior; platooning; safety evaluation; traffic conflict indicators; lane closures
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES