Surrogate safety evaluation of a multimodal combined alternate-direction lane assignment and reservation-based intersection control
M. Knezevic, A. Stevanovic
Pages: 57-72
Abstract:
The concept for management of directionally unrestricted traffic flows in urban areas called Combined Alternate-Direction Lane Assignment and Reservation-Based Intersection Control (CADLARIC) has been recently developed. CADLARIC concept aims to optimize traffic flow in urban areas by efficiently managing directionally unrestricted traffic flows, thereby reducing congestion and improving overall traffic efficiency. The main idea behind CADLARIC is to organize traffic flow in the connected and automated vehicles environment and distribute vehicular conflicts between links and intersections to prevent intersections from turning into traffic bottlenecks. In the proposed concept, vehicles can use lanes traditionally reserved for the opposite direction of travel. Through its reservation-based algorithm, CADLARIC effectively manages conflicts for through vehicles, ensuring seamless passage and minimizing delays at intersections. However, CADLARIC in its current state is only based on vehicular flow and does not include pedestrians. Adding pedestrians impacts traffic flow efficiency and introduces additional conflicts which are handled on a Pedestrian Priority basis. Pedestrians reserved their path when attempting to cross at intersections, thereby inflicting the behavior of vehicles within the simulation. In this paper we evaluated safety of CADLARIC in comparison with Fully Reservation-Based Intersection Control with conventional lane assignment (FRIC), and Fixed Time Control. The findings indicate that the CADLARIC control strategy demonstrates significant potential for enhancing intersection safety. It surpasses the FRIC control scheme in terms of safety performance, particularly under conditions of increased vehicular and pedestrian demand, as evidenced by improvements in all surrogate safety measures analyzed in this study.
Keywords: surrogate safety; pedestrians; reservation-based control; connected vehicles
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES