A quantitative evaluation about the safety of intended functionality (SOTIF) for adaptive cruise control based on extension optimization
X.-X. Zhao, J.-Q. Li, Z.-T.
Li
Pages: 263-282
Abstract:
Regarding the safety of the
intended functionality (SOTIF) of the existing adaptive cruise control (ACC)
algorithm in the context of curved roads, this paper proposes a novel
adaptive cruise control algorithm. This algorithm is predicated on the
extension of coordinated control optimization. The study aims to address the
insufficient consideration of lateral and longitudinal dynamics coupling
effects by conventional algorithms under complex curved-road driving
conditions, as well as the absence of a systematic quantitative evaluation
framework for SOTIF. The objective of this proposal is to enhance the
functionality of the adaptive cruise control system in scenarios involving
curves and variations in road adhesion coefficients. To this end, a quantitative
evaluation system has been developed to analyze the safety risk scores of
control algorithms under these scenarios. Initially, an analysis of the
adaptive cruise system is conducted to ensure the SOTIF demand. This analysis
employs a system theoretic process analysis (STPA)method and proposes a
functional enhancement goal for the curved road scenario. Secondly, a control
strategy for prediction based on lateral and longitudinal coupling is
constructed using extension coordinated control theory. A quantitative
evaluation system is constructed based on the national standard through the
joint simulation of Carsim and Matlab/Simulink. The efficacy of the enhanced
algorithm is substantiated by the observation that it successfully reduces
the traditional algorithm's score.
Keywords: safety of the intended
functionality; curving adaptive cruise control; extension coordinated control
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES
