Comparing public transport travel perceptions for public transport and personalized vehicle users in well-connected city – Case study of Kolkata, India
S. Wasim Anwar, R. Bandyopadhyaya
Pages: 39-50
Abstract:
It is important to understand commuters’ attitude towards the well-known
benefits of using public transport namely, reduction of congestion and
pollution and their attitude towards using public transport for work trips.
This would help to understand potential user expectations and whether they
are ready to continue using public transport in future provided there is an
improvement in connectivity. This work aims to compare how individual’s
demographic profile influences their attitude towards using public transport
and their perception about using public transport for work trips for regular
public transport users and personalized vehicle users. Theory of Planned Behavior framework was
used for systematically studying public transport use perceptions.
Face-to-face interview was conducted in Kolkata, India between November 2021
and October 2022 and 345 (233 public transport and 112 personalized vehicle)
user responses were obtained and used for study. The findings show that male
public transport commuters believe that public transport travel reduces
congestion and pollution and their public transport travel will be pleasant,
good and time saving in future. However, gender do-not influence commuters’
beliefs for personalized vehicle users. Educated public transport commuters
were observed to believe that safety in public transport travel will not
improve in future. Educated personalizes vehicle commuters on the other hand
believe that travel time in public transport travel will reduce in future.
Personalized vehicle commuters having lower income perceives that
availability, safety, connectivity and travel time will improve for public
transport travel and thus has potential to shift to public transport in
future.
Keywords: public transport; personalized vehicle; Theory of Planned Behavior; Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES