Evaluating the safety of freeway tunnels based on the driving behavior and physiological responses: a route familiarity perspective
S. Huang, J. Wang, H. Li
Pages: 217-232
Abstract:
Long freeway tunnels are vital
for sustainable transportation, reducing travel distances and environmental
impact. Ensuring their operational safety is key to achieving these
sustainability goals. While driver behavior and physiological responses
heavily influence tunnel safety, the impact of route familiarity, especially
on sustainable safety measures, remains under-explored. This study evaluates
how driver route familiarity affects driving behavior and physiological
responses in China’s Yanzidong tunnel to optimize sustainable and safe
operations. A field experiment with 32 familiar and un-familiar drivers
collected data on driving behavior (average speed, acceleration) and
physiological responses (heart rate, skin conductance) across entrance, median,
and exit tunnel sections. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) developed a
quantitative risk score for each section, reflecting driver safety and
comfort. Key findings revealed familiar drivers exhibited stable acceleration
and heart rates but drove at higher speeds with generally elevated heart
rates. Unfamiliar drivers displayed greater fluctuations in acceleration and
heart rate, alongside lower average speeds and heart rates. Risk analysis
showed familiar drivers faced higher risks in the median section, linked to
over-confidence and speed, while unfamiliar drivers experienced higher risks
at entrances and exits due to higher cognitive load in an unfamiliar
environment. These insights are crucial for developing targeted management
strategies that address the distinct challenges of varying driver
familiarity. Such strategies will significantly enhance tunnel safety and
comfort, thereby improving the overall sustainability and effectiveness of
these critical transportation infrastructures.
Keywords: route familiarity; drive
behavior; physiological response; long tunnel; principal com-ponent analysis
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES