Factors shaping user satisfaction in ride-hailing: evidence from personal vehicle owners
S. Deb, K. Bhagwat
Pages: 157-176
Abstract:
Background: In the context of small and medium sized cities of India,
where car ownership is prevalent, it is essential to explore how personal
vehicle owners perceive and utilize Ride Hailing Service (RHS). This study
aims to fill the gap in literature by focusing on this specific user group
and examining the socio-economic characteristics affecting their
satisfaction. Methods: A survey of 718 car owners in Guwahati, India,
collected data on socio-economic characteristics and RHS attributes. Using
Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), we analysed these factors through
SERVQUAL’s five dimensions—empathy, responsiveness, assurance, tangibility,
and reliability—plus app features. Results: Empathy towards the users of RHS
emerged as the most critical factor for user satisfaction, followed by
responsiveness, assurance, tangibility, and reliability. Lower-income users
prioritized empathy and responsiveness, higher-income users emphasized
responsiveness and assurance, and male users valued empathy and responsiveness
while females prioritized assurance.
Policy implications: The study recommends inclusive policies to
address varying perceptions among socio-economic groups, promoting RHS
adoption and reducing car ownership in urban areas. Novelty: While RHS
studies focus largely on large cities, this research targets Guwahati, a
medium-sized Indian city, filling a literature gap on smaller urban centres
in emerging economies. This study contributes region-specific insights into
RHS satisfaction and provides a foundation for policies promoting RHS as a
car ownership alternative, especially relevant for India's mid-sized urban
areas facing unique transportation challenges.
Keywords: Ride Hailing Service; Structural Equation Modeling; users’ perception; socio-economic characteristics; qualitative data analysis
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES