Improved Driving Risk Field – based identification of vehicle interaction risks in the upstream transition area of expressway work zones
L.H. Zhao, Y.P. Liu, M.Y.
Zuo, W.F. Gao, W.X. Wang, J. Zhang
Pages: 161-178
Abstract:
In order to solve the problem that it is
difficult to identify the vehicle interaction risk in the upstream transition
area of expressway work zones, this paper proposes a vehicle interaction risk
identification model based on the Improved Driving Risk Field. In this paper,
the traffic flow data in the upstream transition area is collected through
the fixed-point camera, and the vehicle trajectory data is output by
simulation using VISSIM software to screen the pairs of following vehicles
and lane-changing vehicles. The IDRF model in this paper comprehensively
considers the characteristics of the upstream transition area, driver risk
factors, vehicle dynamic risk differences and vehicle virtual risk bands, and
calibrates the parameters using genetic algorithms and Poliakov models. The
performance of the IDRF model is validated by comparing the performance of
IDRF, DRF (Driving Risk Field), THWI (Time Headway Inverse) and TTCI (Time To
Collision Inverse) models in vehicle interaction risk identification. The
results show that the IDRF model has the best identification performance.
Among them, the IDRF model shows higher consistency with the THWI model in
the follow-through interaction risk identification. In lane change
interaction risk identification, the IDRF model improved the risk
identification rate by 5.21% compared to the DRF model, 49.66% compared to
the THWI model, and 81.04% compared to the TTCI model. Based on the risk
visualisation results of the model in this paper, the traffic management
department can improve the safety supervision level of expressway maintenance
and construction operations.
Keywords: traffic engineering; interaction risk
identification; improved driving risk fields; upstream transition area of
expressway work zones; risk visualization
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES
