Study on the impact of driver behavior differences on traffic guidance efficiency
S.Q. Long, J.Y. Zhang, S.F.
Wang
Pages: 119-136
Abstract:
Urban traffic guidance system
is the key solution to modern traffic congestion, and drivers are the main
participants in traffic travel, so it is particularly important to explore
the mechanism of the influence of driver's driving behavior differences on
the induction efficiency of traffic guidance system. According to different
driving styles, this paper divides the road network drivers into three types:
conservative, ordinary and aggressive. This paper studies the influence of
driver's path choice behavior and vehicle driving behavior characteristics on
traffic guidance efficiency, quantifies its decision error and vehicle
driving efficiency on traffic guidance information. As for route selection
behaviour, based on SP (Stated Preference) questionnaire data, a driver path
selection model was constructed using a binary Logit model to predict the
probability of different types of drivers changing paths when receiving
traffic guidance information. In terms of vehicle driving behavior
characteristics, according to the different driving behavior habits of
different types of drivers, the corresponding driver driving characteristics
model is established to simulate the actual state of vehicles driving in the
road network. Finally, a traffic guidance system based on system optimization
was constructed based on SUMO simulation platform and simulation experiments
were conducted. The average vehicle speed, CO2 and CO emissions were used as
indicators to evaluate the traffic guidance efficiency of the road network.
The results show that, compared with other drivers, ordinary drivers have the
best performance on the traffic guidance system. After induction, the vehicle
speed increases by 10.59%, the CO2 emission decreases by 0.93%, and the CO
emission decreases by 10.19%.
Keywords: traffic induction efficiency; driving
behavior; Logit model; routing; vehicle driving behavior characteristics
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES