Prediction of traffic accident severity based on ordered classification models
Y. Wang, X. Wang
Pages: 443-462
Abstract:
Road traffic accidents remain a critical global issue, necessitating accurate prediction of injury severity to enhance safety management. Unlike most existing studies that treat accident severity as a nominal categorical variable, this research emphasizes its inherent ordinal nature (slight, serious, and fatal injury). So we primarily propose and evaluate two ordered classification (OC) models—Generalized Ordered Logistic Regression (GLR) model and a novel Weighted K-Nearest Neighbors (WKNN) classifier, which explicitly incorporate the order of injury severity. The GLR model utilizes the cumulative probability of categories instead of the probability corresponding to a single category in Logistic Regression (LR). The novel WKNN classifier assigns different weights to varying severity levels, thereby breaking the equality relationship between categories in the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) classifier. Using a real-world dataset of 12,316 traffic accident records from Addis Ababa (2017–2020) and combining Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN) resampling. Furthermore, it is found that the predictive capabilities of the model are similar across the two resampling methods (ADASYN and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE)) and the two missing value handling approaches (deletion and imputation). Additionally, beyond the four unordered classification (UC) evaluation metrics, this paper employs an indicator named Total misclassification Cost (TC) that simultaneously accounts for the ordinal nature of the dependent variable and class imbalance. The TC value of the OC model can decrease by approximately 10% to 80%, significantly reducing the misclassification cost of the OC model. This study provides a structured and data-aware framework for traffic accident severity prediction, offering more reliable decision support for traffic safety management.
Keywords: severity of traffic accidents; Adaptive Synthetic Sampling; Ordinal Logistic Regression; Weighted K-Nearest Neighbors
2026 ISSUES
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES
