Crash comparison of vehicles with modern safety features versus conventional vehicles using Artificial Intelligence: a deep learning-based analysis
B.R. Al-Sayyed, H.H. Naghawi, A.H.
Alomari
Pages: 117-138
Abstract:
As automotive technology advances, modern
vehicles are becoming increasingly integrated with advanced safety systems
designed to prevent collisions or minimize injuries. Still, their
effectiveness compared to older cars is not well documented, particularly in
developing regions. This research highlights the gap by examining the
differences in crash outcomes between vehicles equipped with sophisticated
safety features, such as Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC), Automatic Emergency
Braking (AEB), and Lane Departure Warning (LDW), and those without these
features. We obtained traffic and insurance crash data from Jordan, which
were supplemented with demographic, contextual, and vehicle-related
information, then predicted, balanced, and enriched. A hybrid deep learning
model, based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Long Short-Term
Memory (LSTM) networks, is used for the analysis. Four deep learning models,
1D CNN, RNN, LSTM, and CNN-LSTM, were evaluated for their ability to classify
injury severity levels. The CNN-LSTM model consistently outperformed others,
achieving an accuracy of 97% and an AUC of 99%. These results highlight the
effectiveness of hybrid models in capturing both spatial and temporal
patterns in crash data. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that modern
safety-equipped vehicles are associated with significantly lower injury
severity, supporting the case for broader adoption of these technologies. The
study not only contributes to the growing body of research on AI in traffic
safety but also offers valuable insights for policymakers, car manufacturers,
and urban planners aiming to enhance road safety through data-driven
strategies.
Keywords: crash severity; vehicle safety; Advanced
Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS); Artificial Intelligence (AI): deep learning
2026 ISSUES
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES
